What sort of country do we want to become? Ian McDonald skrifar 11. maí 2023 07:31 The Icelandic government has undergone a shift in priorities over the past few years. Not too long ago, the welfare and wellbeing of its people were seen as an utmost priority, and everything else existed in order to facilitate that wellbeing. Today, tourists and specifically the money they bring, are valued far more than the lives and livelihood of the people who call Iceland home, and furthermore those people now exist mostly to facilitate the wellbeing and comfort of those wealthy tourists. The government likes to claim that the vast amounts of money brought in by tourism will naturally trickle down and wash over the population, bringing prosperity to all it touches. This might be a reality in a fair and just system, or one where the biggest industries are not owned by a tiny handful of people and their families. In that reality, the riches only get concentrated in a few hands and then squirreled away offshore to avoid scrutiny from the tax office. The end result of this kind of a system is for Iceland to end up as a place just like Monaco. One which is hugely expensive, and where the vast majority of jobs are in the service industry, whose workers cannot even afford to live in the cities which they work, serving the rich who travel there. In these kind of places, the government does not care about high prices for food, housing or transportation because they know that the visiting tourists are happy to pay a premium for the privilege of visiting. Therefore there is no incentive to lower costs. Lower prices mean lower profits. Conversely, the workers are forced to pay these extortionate prices because they have no other choice. They are trapped in a system where they spend their entire paycheck just to survive. If the Icelandic government wants to live up to its well-polished, massaged image of equality and a high standard of living, which it likes to portray to the rest of the world, they must state clearly that the people who live here are prioritized more highly than tourist dollars, and to act accordingly. We live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The GDP of Iceland in 2022 was almost 7 percent, which equates to around 25 billion dollars. There is no reason for people to not be able to afford to survive. No excuses. The author is a member of Efling Union. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Kynntu þér reglur ritstjórnar um skoðanagreinar. Senda grein Kjaramál Kjaraviðræður 2022-23 Ian McDonald Mest lesið Hvers vegna ég skipti um skoðun á aðild Íslands að Evrópusambandinu Gunnar Ármannsson Skoðun Aðildarviðræður eru ekki upplýsingaleit heldur undirbúningur að aðild Gunnar Ármannsson Skoðun Sjö algengar ranghugmyndir um hvali og hvalveiðar Eyþór Eðvarðsson Skoðun Meitlað í stein eða kannski, hugsanlega, ef til vill Sigurður Egilsson Skoðun Um líf og dauða, fullveldi og ESB II Bjarni Már Magnússon Skoðun Gervigreind á ekki að hugsa fyrir okkur Helgi S. Karlsson Skoðun Almyrkvi á sólu 12.ágúst 2026: Gagnlegar upplýsingar Runólfur Þórhallsson Skoðun Að hafa rétt eftir Ingólfur Sverrisson Skoðun Stafrænt fullveldi er ekki frönsk sérviska Þorsteinn Siglaugsson Skoðun Um líf og dauða, fullveldi og ESB Bjarni Már Magnússon Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Þjóðarvarnarráðið hefur verið kallað saman af minna tilefni! Davíð Bergmann skrifar Skoðun Orðspor og ímynd bíður hnekki Haukur Hinriksson skrifar Skoðun Stafrænt fullveldi er ekki frönsk sérviska Þorsteinn Siglaugsson skrifar Skoðun Gervigreind á ekki að hugsa fyrir okkur Helgi S. Karlsson skrifar Skoðun Hvers vegna ég skipti um skoðun á aðild Íslands að Evrópusambandinu Gunnar Ármannsson skrifar Skoðun Mannréttindi eru ekki skrifstofa heldur framkvæmd Auður Axelsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Af hverju „Nei“ 29. ágúst? Alfreð Sturla Böðvarsson skrifar Skoðun Að hafa rétt eftir Ingólfur Sverrisson skrifar Skoðun Hvaða áhættu tekur Ísland ef við breytum engu? – Framtíðarsýn til ársins 2050 Þorvaldur Ingi Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Almyrkvi á sólu 12.ágúst 2026: Gagnlegar upplýsingar Runólfur Þórhallsson skrifar Skoðun Um líf og dauða, fullveldi og ESB II Bjarni Már Magnússon skrifar Skoðun Meitlað í stein eða kannski, hugsanlega, ef til vill Sigurður Egilsson skrifar Skoðun Krónuhagkerfið og kostnaður heimilanna Sigurður Kristinn Pálsson skrifar Skoðun Litir, form og staðarandi Þórður Már Sigfússon skrifar Skoðun Brexit ekki orsök efnahagsáskorana Breta Kristinn Sv. Helgason skrifar Skoðun Jörðin er dómkirkjan okkar. Geimurinn er verkstæðið okkar. Árni Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Stækkun bílaborgarinnar er ekki sjálfgefin - Ný byggð til norðurs kallar á öflugri almenningssamgöngur Stefán Agnar Finnsson skrifar Skoðun Hvenær hættir maður að vera útlendingur? Valerio Gargiulo skrifar Skoðun Viðvörunarljós um farsæld barna má ekki hunsa Steinunn Bergmann skrifar Skoðun Sjö algengar ranghugmyndir um hvali og hvalveiðar Eyþór Eðvarðsson skrifar Skoðun Aðildarviðræður eru ekki upplýsingaleit heldur undirbúningur að aðild Gunnar Ármannsson skrifar Skoðun Um líf og dauða, fullveldi og ESB Bjarni Már Magnússon skrifar Skoðun Ný greining: Hvað myndu húsnæðisvextir lækka með ESB og evru? Dagur B. Eggertsson skrifar Skoðun Hvað er í pakkanum? Hannes Lúðvíksson skrifar Skoðun Nýsköpunin sem hverfur inn í skýið Bogi Ragnarsson skrifar Skoðun Þegar kaffið rennur upp á við í Undralandi íslenskrar orðræðu Sigurður Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Þeir seldu áhættuna sem tækifæri — og sendu þjóðinni reikninginn Baldur Pétursson skrifar Skoðun Traust á lögmönnum er ekki einkamál lögmanna Vilbert Gústafsson skrifar Skoðun Upplýsingar eru ekki ógn, þær eru forsenda Halldór Jörgen Olesen skrifar Skoðun Heimilislæknar og reglugerðardrög Alma D. Möller skrifar Sjá meira
The Icelandic government has undergone a shift in priorities over the past few years. Not too long ago, the welfare and wellbeing of its people were seen as an utmost priority, and everything else existed in order to facilitate that wellbeing. Today, tourists and specifically the money they bring, are valued far more than the lives and livelihood of the people who call Iceland home, and furthermore those people now exist mostly to facilitate the wellbeing and comfort of those wealthy tourists. The government likes to claim that the vast amounts of money brought in by tourism will naturally trickle down and wash over the population, bringing prosperity to all it touches. This might be a reality in a fair and just system, or one where the biggest industries are not owned by a tiny handful of people and their families. In that reality, the riches only get concentrated in a few hands and then squirreled away offshore to avoid scrutiny from the tax office. The end result of this kind of a system is for Iceland to end up as a place just like Monaco. One which is hugely expensive, and where the vast majority of jobs are in the service industry, whose workers cannot even afford to live in the cities which they work, serving the rich who travel there. In these kind of places, the government does not care about high prices for food, housing or transportation because they know that the visiting tourists are happy to pay a premium for the privilege of visiting. Therefore there is no incentive to lower costs. Lower prices mean lower profits. Conversely, the workers are forced to pay these extortionate prices because they have no other choice. They are trapped in a system where they spend their entire paycheck just to survive. If the Icelandic government wants to live up to its well-polished, massaged image of equality and a high standard of living, which it likes to portray to the rest of the world, they must state clearly that the people who live here are prioritized more highly than tourist dollars, and to act accordingly. We live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The GDP of Iceland in 2022 was almost 7 percent, which equates to around 25 billion dollars. There is no reason for people to not be able to afford to survive. No excuses. The author is a member of Efling Union.
Skoðun Hvers vegna ég skipti um skoðun á aðild Íslands að Evrópusambandinu Gunnar Ármannsson skrifar
Skoðun Hvaða áhættu tekur Ísland ef við breytum engu? – Framtíðarsýn til ársins 2050 Þorvaldur Ingi Jónsson skrifar
Skoðun Stækkun bílaborgarinnar er ekki sjálfgefin - Ný byggð til norðurs kallar á öflugri almenningssamgöngur Stefán Agnar Finnsson skrifar
Skoðun Aðildarviðræður eru ekki upplýsingaleit heldur undirbúningur að aðild Gunnar Ármannsson skrifar